Miscellany

Learning to play “Hallelujah” from a YouTube tutorial


No Comments

I’m a fan of YouTube tutorials for all sorts of learning, for everything from fishing to caring for a fire-bellied toad (yes, my son’s got one as a pet). And lately, I’ve been realizing how much fun it can be to learn (or try to learn) how to play songs with the help of YouTube tutors. Here’s a tutorial about learning Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” on the piano. The last time I checked, it had been viewed a whopping 1,840,196 times. Wow!

If you’re looking for more info on this trend, check out my column about YouTube tutorials.

Tech, Writing

1,000+ Microsoft Word docs, plain text, and a file format mess


2 Comments

Over the past couple of days, I’ve been opening 1,000+ Word documents on my computer, one by one, and converting them from a very, very old Word format (“Microsoft Word 1.x-5.x”) to something I’ll actually be able to read and open on my computer. It’s a laborious process. When Microsoft “upgraded” to Office 2008 for the Mac, the company decided it was necessary to make it super-difficult to work with some older Word file formats.

I’ve actually known about this issue for years — I wrote a column touching on it three years ago — but I only decided to tackle it now, in part because I’m trying to weed out documents in old file formats (old Word, old AppleWorks) before I upgrade to Apple OS X Lion.

It’s not fun.

And I’m guessing plenty of writers — or, really, anyone who’s used a computer for writing (uh, like everyone) — have no idea that they may have many, many orphaned documents on their computers. Poems. Love letters. Journals. Whatever.

The longer you wait to convert those documents, the harder it gets — until it’s nearly impossible to retrieve the text.

I have some documents I trashed: I had no idea how to retrieve the information in them. I’m sure it could be done, somehow, but I couldn’t figure out how.

I was thinking about this when I read an excellent article at MacWorld, “Forget fancy formatting: Why plain text is best.”

Writer David Sparks addresses just this issue:

Looking back through my old files, I’m amazed to see how many word processors I’ve used over the years. I’ve got document files in formats ranging from MacWrite to Pages and everything in between. The problem is, a lot of those old files are useless to me now: None of my current word processors can read them. That’s a shame; some of those old words were pretty good.

His solution? Use plain text.

Sensible advice, no doubt, though the mix of tools he uses, for different purposes, seems a bit complex to me. That said, I guess it’s something like my ad-hoc system, using Pages, SimpleNote, Google Docs, and Word (if I must).

And now, as I’m dealing with this mess of old Word files, I’m going to start rethinking how I save documents. Should I use plain text? Or Google Docs? I’m not quite sure.

Tech

Review: “The Book of Audacity”


No Comments

A couple of years ago, I was preparing an audio slideshow with the wonderful tool Slideshare. I needed an audio editor for the audio track, and I wasn’t sure where to start. I had very little experience with audio editing, and a colleague directed me to an open-source tool, Audacity. Though it took me a while to get up to speed with it, once I did I saw the potential in Audacity, which is extremely capable and flexible (and is available for free for the Mac, Windows, and Linux).

Well, it turns out I only worked with a miniscule portion of Audacity’s capabilities.

How did I learn about what’s possible with Audacity? Certainly not from roaming around the application and playing with it. Sure, that’s possible, but it’s also ridiculously time-consuming.

Instead, I turned to “The Book of Audacity: Record, Edit, Mix, and Master with the Free Audio Editor,” author Carla Schroder’s comprehensive guide to anything and everything that’s possible with Audacity.

Audacity is an extremely adaptable tool. It’s particularly useful when you’re on a budget, and you’re looking to explore the possibilities of digital audio editing. You might be looking to produce a relatively simple audio track, like I was, or you might be seeking to do something a bit more complex. Either way, Audacity is likely to help you get the job done.

In “The Book of Audacity” (No Starch Press; $34.95), Schroder provides easy-to-follow instructions for the variety of tasks you can tackle with Audacity. That includes the obvious ones, like making a recording for a podcast or inclusion as a voice-over in a movie or slideshow, but it also includes others you might not have considered (or known you could accomplish with a free tool). These include editing and mastering multitrack recordings, digitizing your album collection (and removing pops and hisses), and developing custom ringtones or special effects.

I particularly appreciated the chapter with this title: “Building a Good Digital Sound Studio on the Cheap.” I’ve been getting into producing more and more multimedia, and as anyone who’s done this knows, top-notch sound quality is essential. Even minor glitches in an audio soundtrack can ruin your narration for a presentation or movie. With Audacity, you’re able to clean up your “ums” and other stumbles, and Schroder’s book helps you do that.

Beyond all of this, “The Book of Audacity” serves as a useful and thorough primer for anyone who’s exploring audio recording and editing. It covers a slew of concepts, from audio DVDs to podcasting to multitrack recording, and it does so with style. It’s a handy and helpful book for fans of Audacity (or newcomers to the software), but it’s also a terrific reference for audiophiles.

(In the interest of full disclosure: My book about iPhone photography, “Create Great iPhone Photos,” is also published by No Starch Press.)

Tech

Is Quora unfathomable? Or a cultural phenomenon?


Quora has been the hot startup for a while now, and I’ve been meaning to write about it for my column. I finally did that, and here’s how I opened things: “Maybe it’s a sign of an internet startup’s likelihood of success that its initial attraction is entirely unfathomable — or even unexplainable — to the general population.”

Is Quora’s popularity — popularity, that is, among an elite of techies — unfathomable? Not entirely, but I think the site’s appeal will be lost on many, many people. What is Quora? It’s essentially a website for asking questions and getting answers. That’s simple enough. Sites like that, such as Aardvark, Answers.com and Yahoo! Answers, have been around for a while. But Quora makes the Q&A experience hyper-social, with a Facebook-like layer of following and whatnot.

I’m just not sure this is going to translate into a phenomenon along the lines of YouTube or Twitter or Facebook.

Read my column.

Photography

100 camera and photo apps in 100 days


No Comments

Over at my What I See Now blog, which is all about iPhone photography, I’ve got a new project: 100 Photo Apps. The idea is pretty simple: Over 100 days, I’ll post 100 images from 100 different iPhone camera and photography apps. I’m thinking of the project as a way to showcase the best photo apps and also highlight what’s possible with iPhone photography and the iPhone camera.

Which is quite a lot. There are Photoshop-like image editors for the iPhone, photobooth apps, and lots of tools for recreating the photographic techniques and tools of yesteryear. If you want to get a sense of the possibilities, check out my 100 Photo Apps posts at What I See Now, and also think about viewing this video I put together for my book, Create Great iPhone Photos.

Photography, Writing

Why do I have three (yes, three) photoblogs?


2 Comments

OK, so maybe you haven’t really been wondering this, but it’s the truth. I now have three separate photography blogs. Not long ago, I wasn’t even blogging, and now I feel like I’m something of a blogging maniac, in part because of the ease of creating and managing a blog with Tumblr. So what are these blogs, and how are they different? Here are quick descriptions:

What I See Now: News and advice about iPhone photography. Learn about iPhone photography contests and exhibits, video tutorials, gadgets, and updates to iPhoneography apps. I also post occasional photos (of my own) at this blog.

Really Great iPhone Photos: Here’s where I post other people’s awesome iPhone photos, either by reblogging them with Tumblr or by contacting and getting permission from Flickr members.

Domestic Tableaux: I just put this up. Tumblr makes it easy to let a blog accept submissions, and I’ve been wanting to try that sort of blog for a while. Domestic Tableaus is all about photos of what’s on your kitchen counter, bedroom bureau, or somewhere else. Those images can be interesting, funny, or even sad or poignant.

So there you have: my photoblogs.

Distracted Living, Writing

David Ulin on the lost art of reading


No Comments

Back in 2009, David Ulin of “The Los Angeles Times” wrote a short essay, “The Lost Art of Reading.” The premise was simple: Our lives make it increasingly difficult to focus on reading. (And reading, in this context, doesn’t mean reading your Twitter feed.) Why is this? It’s because our lives are filled with noise, especially the “noise” of the Internet, and so it’s a lot harder to filter out that noise. As he writes: “Such a state is increasingly elusive in our over-networked culture, in which every rumor and mundanity is blogged and tweeted. Today, it seems it is not contemplation we seek but an odd sort of distraction masquerading as being in the know. Why? Because of the illusion that illumination is based on speed, that it is more important to react than to think, that we live in a culture in which something is attached to every bit of time.”

You can read his essay, and now you can read his book on the topic, “The Lost Art of Reading: Why Books Matter in a Distracted Time.”

Photography

My new photoblog, Really Great iPhone Photos


No Comments

I’ve got another photoblog: Really Great iPhone Photos.

It doesn’t take much to figure out the subject of the blog, but I’ll explain, briefly. I’ve got one photoblog, What I See Now, that’s all about iPhone photography—news about apps, info about iPhoneography contests, and also my own iPhone photos (now and then). Really Great iPhone Photos, on the other hand, is about just that—awesome iPhone photos I find online (and mainly at Tumblr, where it’s extremely easy to repost other people’s photos).

Now, you may wonder: Doesn’t it take a lot of time to do all this blogging? Well, yes and no. Tumblr makes things very, very easy, and the new blog, Really Great iPhone Photos, is pretty much just about reposting (i.e., reblogging, to use Tumblr’s term) the photos of people I follow on Tumblr. I’m able to check out my Tumblr Dashboard (to view the latest photos from people I follow), and choose those I really like.

Photography

10 ideas from the backwards world of photographer Chase Jarvis


No Comments

I learned about Chase Jarvis from his book of iPhone photography, “The Best Camera,” but he’s about a lot more than that. He’s a professional photographer, a filmmaker, and a sort of creativity and social media guru. I heard him speak at the PDN PhotoPlus expo and conference at the Javits center in New York.

Here’s my takeaway of the ideas and inspiration from his keynote.

1. “This is the most exciting time in the history of the world to be a photographer.” There are video cameras that shoot stills, still cameras that shoot video, and you can take a photo and send it online in seconds.

2. “There’s something beautiful about backwards.” Meaning, I guess, you don’t need to take the established path. “I was in a band in high school,” he said. “I had no idea how to sing or play an instrument.” He went to college on a soccer scholarship, but now he’s a photographer (“I overcame a stigma as a jock to be an artist”). He quit a Ph.D. program in philosophy art. So: “There are more paths to get to where you want to go.”

3. His inspiration? Rothko, Rauschenberg, Warhol. “They weren’t just doing better art,” he said. “They were reinventing it. That’s what inspired me.”

4. Do something. Create. That’s what Jarvis did. “What I really wanted to do was go make something on my own.”

5. Quitting is OK. Why finish something if it’s not working? “If a book sucks, put it down.”

6. He was vilified for sharing. In Seattle, he started sharing what happened in the photographic process, from the photo shoot to what appeared in print or online. “I was completely vilified,” he said. “I was ostracized by my peers.” He said “the old guard of photography” felt he was taking knowledge and handing it to 18-year-olds with Nikon D40s. He put a video out, and 30,000 people watched it within a week. He was interviewing models, showing the mistakes he made, pointing the camera back at himself. He even did a live photography shoot, and broadcast it, and thousands watched for eight hours.

7. Distribute your content. “Content creators are also distributors,” he said. “We don’t have to ask anyone’s permission.” Before this, you had to get permission to show your work on any sort of scale, like from magazine editors or gallery owners. You needed to get “tapped” by those people. “Those days are over,” he said.

8. A sorta new term: “social art.” This is interactive, participatory, and all about other people participating with you. “The world needs a new culture around creativity,” he said. He puts on these dinners, “Songs for Eating and Drinking,” where he invites musicians and other creative types to have dinner, to take photos, to grab video, to eat great food. Then there’s “The Best Camera,” which isn’t just a book, but also an iPhone app and an online photo sharing website. For his new book, “Seattle 100,” he got creative types in Seattle to participate in the book.

9. Why do this? “It feels good. People want to create.
A more creative world is a better world.” Also: “The right-brained people will drive the bus.” He noted the work of Seth Godin, Malcolm Gladwell, and Daniel Pink, all of whom have written about creativity.

10. “Take more pictures. Be fearless. At the end of the day, what I am talking about is the democratization of creativity. It starts with you.”